To these effects, the company will have to prove the alleged results and justify them is deducted minimally the reasonableness of the extinctive decision. As you can see, far to realize the economic causes, remains vague, with what the decision on whether applies from dismissal with 20 days of salary remains in the hands of the judiciary, without having overtones that the tendency of judges and magistrates of the order social to describe unfair motivated economic reasons layoffs will vary. Another stellar measure that has been introduced in the labor reform is the State subsidy of the dismissals through the wage guarantee fund, better known by FOGASA. From the entry into force of this Royal Decree, a portion of the compensation that corresponds to the worker shall be paid directly by FOGASA in an amount equivalent to eight days of wages per year worked, while this measure will only apply to those permanent contracts that have been concluded after the entry into force of the labour reform. But really We have a red herring, since the reality is that the FOGASA is nothing more than an administrative agency financed by the contributions of employers, i.e., a piggy bank public funded by companies, so it not would be unreasonable thinking that, having to cope with more expenses, quotas have been increasing, reaching the case that those companies that do not dismiss being disadvantaged by this new regulation to see as is they increase quotas that must be tackled. One of the points about which there was some expectation and that this passes reform virtually long is collective bargaining. It had speculated much with the possibility that there was a reform of collective bargaining.