The Transfiguration of spar hysteria against the benefit of higher public debt, persistent unemployment, consumption (consumption) and corporate investments (investment) are no match. In times of jobless growth, so growth without improvement in the employment situation, especially the economic decline will benefit from the expansion of consumption of investment conversely more investment promotes the consumption. Without mathematically closer look on the whole”is clear: reduced national income (real GDP), part of entrepreneurial capital investments will be destroyed as a result. In other words: saving, so less consumption means less income. In turn, this implies necessarily a process that only ends when so increasing the poverty of the people, that just saved what is invested. Not more, but less capital goods are in demand at low level of national income. It is needed so no inventiveness, to realize that the entrepreneurial investments ipso thus go back facto in praxi. Bizarre perverse theories is, when discretion public at the same time as true or false or obsolete are hawked.

like for example the legend that the current generation is obliged, existentially secure their successors by thrift. Attempting to save more, cause in reality even smaller savings and investments. The absurdity of economic savings could only be carried ad absurdum if ingenious and cautious public and private intervention. Ex usu chances are that bad. It remains therefore inexplicable why not the sensible way of significantly higher deficits in the sense of a real paradigm shift is forced down. Previous generations cared a wet waste”to their successors. The apotheosis of spar hysteria, which is a significantly higher public debt against the benefit, should be in the interest of prosperity and geraten…sozusagen lege artis quickly forgotten at European level, because of and in spite of Maastricht”improved employment situation.