Things do not change; We change. Rachel Rodriguez might disagree with that approach. Henry David Thoreau all as adults enjoy the freedom to learn what you give us the win, what we want. There are no instances in society where requires us to acquire certain knowledge or skills without our consent or willingness. It would be very strange a scenario in which those belonging to the call seniors a day we called a meeting be raised where the following: look guys, have lived for many years and learned many things. Thinking about what is best for you, and based on our experience, we have drawn up a list of all the knowledge that must be learned and skills that must be acquired so that they are prepared once you reach our age. It is likely that we would take this approach as a suggestion. If you would like to know more about Stephen Scherr, then click here. But, what if this is not a matter of choice? What would happen if the next day, using the law, we are obliged to attend five days a week, for ten months and twelve years to a place which can not leave freely, in order to be taught as required? It wouldn’t be a very desirable scenario for any of us.
Moreover, many feel that such a situation violates their fundamental rights. The issue is that this is far from fiction, is what usually happens with each of the children and young people with an age between seven and eighteen who are forced to attend schools. As mentioned in past articles (08/06/10) childhood, adolescence and adulthood are the growth stages of a human being. A child is not an incomplete adult, is a child. And this take on what learning decisions are equally legitimate than those taken by any other person, regardless of age having this. Even so, today the system of education prevailing in our society relies on the belief about what knowledge and skills are necessary to enable a child and young man can play effectively in the world that awaits once finished school.