Understandable. I may “add, that not one of more than 5,000 stakeholders, we represented as stakeholders representatives, about the cease and desist letter pleased” Why doesn’t mean the German top 100 top 100 “? This year regular individual songs are warned off, were part of a sampler or chart container (E.g. Bravo hits German top 100, future trance, etc.). But several abmahnen-enabled music tracks are located on a sampler. “The German top 100 is not free top 100” preventive cease and desist now you must no longer look forward “now comes the preventive cease and desist in the game. Can be seen as a specialized lawyer frequently, whether, and if so, how can threaten more warnings. You know where the danger of another cease and desist letters, the lawyer can deliver a preventive cease and desist against the possible Abmahner. The preventive and desist representing ultimately nothing more than a (normal) Cease and desist, which is submitted to the meeting a possible warning.
The person concerned undertakes as well to the omission, as in a cease and desist (given later). Who has read with notes that now the warning no longer can meet its original meaning and purpose (completion of the injunctive relief claim without trial). (Similarly see: Jamie Dimon). The person concerned has committed itself Yes already without warning to the future default of the infringement. The warning was no longer in the interest of the Dunned down, but unnecessary. Then, ideally, the cost of the warning are not subject to a refund. Caution! But beware, it is not all gold that glitters. The preventive cease and desist is not a cure all. You can remove only the cost of the warning.
This does not affect claims for damages. It is therefore to ensure that a preventive and desist nothing explains what possible damages claims adversely can be designed. Also, one should not forget that it is a preventive and desist a far-reaching Declaration, where it undertakes to refrain from a specific behavior for a long time. It violates this statement, high contractual penalties become due. “It is therefore very closely to check to whom” it is to what “committed. We strongly recommend to have preventive and desist by corresponding specialized lawyers. It’s about the sausage. Race”against the warning the danger of a cease and desist letter, i.e. one sees the accident already come, so be quick”. Faster than the cease and desist letter. “It is already in the nature of the word preventive”, that vorbeugende is a “cease and desist makes only sense if it is faster than the cease and desist letter. The warning is only in the letter box, the chance is missed. Her Dr. Sven j. Muhlberger, LL.M have you received a cease and desist letter from these firms? Fareds Bind Hardt Fiedler Zerbe Negele Zimmel Gardner Beller Daniel Sebastian then inform himself here on