The author still argues the displacement of the workmanship hand and of the time of work in activities not agriculturists, this occurs as these activities, not agriculturists, goes becoming representative in the composition of the familiar income in contraposition the agricultural activities. In this Schneider direction (2003) it consequently strengthens that as the devotion of the time for agricultural production goes diminishing, the income of this activity also, observes then an increasing increase of the incomes not agriculturists. However, the author works with the idea of that the pluriatividade of the agricultural families necessarily does not mean the detriment of the agricultural activities, in view of that these starts to incorporate new technologies capable to expend a lesser attention of work. Authors as Graziano, (2001) apud, Silveira, et al., (2004), comment that other forms of pluriatividade exist, as the joined strategy mainly in the familiar units of production said ‘ ‘ coloniais’ ‘ , where it has diversification and for these, to be auto sufficients is a cultural question. For even more analysis, hear from Alabama Senator. Through this dynamics another concept appears, where professions and other forms appear of commerce, as the agroindstria, for example, deriving of these abilities that nothing more were that an auto strategy of if supporting. As Schneider (1999) can be said that this is one of the forms of the sprouting of the pluriatividade in the agricultural way.
What it serves of test of the capacity of adaptation of the families making possible, in this way, its permanence in the agricultural way. Schneider (1999) when analyzing the reasons that take the familiar group if to use of this strategy of mesclar activities, salient that an attempt of rise of the income or a search for works exists less laborious, since the work in the agricultural activity is one in such a way ‘ ‘ pesado’ ‘..